^ I wouldn't be so quick to call every 27" 1080p god-awful. That what I experienced from some early releases. Although, my son picked up an 27" Asus FreeSync a 1-1/2 ago and honestly the pixels are tight-strong with dense color. It look as good or better than a 4 year old 24" Asus TN gaming panel he had been using.
I think we should take each manufacture and model with a real-world personal look, rather than lumping them all together. That said, sure with some decent 1440p in the $200-225 realm any more I'd see the extra cash as well spent, but then it matters if you need a card to truely make it playable.
AMD needs to hit the ground with this rumored "Polaris 30" and give it GDDR6. A substitute to a 570 4Gb with a up-tick is speed and bandwidth at a $160 price and you'd have an excellent pairing for this 1080p. While a RX 580 re-spin for $230, would be a darling for such 1440p FreeSync that are seeing better prices.
Comments & Reviews (2)
Decent resolution? FAIL
1920x1080 for anything above 22" is god-awful. That's the same resolution as 19" monitors, just blown up. Hope you like graininess and fuzzy text.
I think we should take each manufacture and model with a real-world personal look, rather than lumping them all together. That said, sure with some decent 1440p in the $200-225 realm any more I'd see the extra cash as well spent, but then it matters if you need a card to truely make it playable.
AMD needs to hit the ground with this rumored "Polaris 30" and give it GDDR6. A substitute to a 570 4Gb with a up-tick is speed and bandwidth at a $160 price and you'd have an excellent pairing for this 1080p. While a RX 580 re-spin for $230, would be a darling for such 1440p FreeSync that are seeing better prices.
Thank you!